Postmodern Culture

Everything you want to know about postmodernism, postmodernity, and postmodern culture. Your guide to achieving postmodern literacy from The Notorious Dr. Rog and the class of ENG 335 at Rollins College.

Monday, September 04, 2006

Bloggrokker (Scott) Jameson

I disagree with Fredric Jameson.
Hang on. I'll back it up.
If I'm gonna "riff" on something Jameson wrote, I'm gonna hafta return to my prior blog post--return to it and see it as, to borrow a term Jameson himself seems fond of, a referent.
Here we go. Snakes on a Plane and its innumerable Internet parodies before its theatrical release and the ways such pre-release parodying reflect the postmodern idea of commentary over authority. There. Done. Referent completed.
And the Jamesonian riff? I hafta ask if SOAP's parodying is really parodying at all or is it in truth pastiche.
According to Jameson, pastiche eclipses parody in our highly postmodern times. Jameson writes "[parody] has lived, and that strange new thing pastiche slowly comes to take its place . . . [pastiche] is a neutral practice of such mimicry, without any of parody's ulterior motives, amputated of the satiric impulse."
Hmmm.
Alright, as I've always understood it, parody and pastiche are both literary mockings--parody meant to insult, pastiche meant as somewhat of a tribute. Jameson and I appear to agree here, although I don't understand what Jameson means by parody's "ulterior motves." Satire, a different device, has such motives. But parody? Is Jameson melding the two? Is this some kind of pluralistic sabotage? Am I derailing myself here?
Back to SOAP. I don't think what the always-hungering-for-something-to-poke-fun-at Comedy Central-fed e-community did to SOAP can be called pastiche. If all those mocking jabs had an underlying current of tribute, I can't say it came across even-handed. I'm still calling it parody, er, parodies, based solely on a theoretical weight in insults. Therefore, regarding Jameson's words concerning parody and pastiche in the Postmodern Age, I respectfully disagree in this instance.
Almostkindasortamaybeperhapswaitasec--
I find myself intrigued with Jameson's statement of pastiche's "neutral practice of such mimicry." Pastiche's neutrality brings to my mind a lack of focus, lack of an agenda--lack of a clearly defind and grounded center. Ah, the absence of a center. Here's some hardcore po-mo.
And what's the most pervasive thing going these days without a center, the great decentralized hydra of postmodernity--the Internet, indeed.
Yes, the Internet, the very "space" where SOAP had its rear servd to it in an electronic flurry of pre-release puns.
Seems like parody's still got some postmodern kick to it after all, eh Jameson?

1 Comments:

Blogger Notorious Dr. Rog said...

I think SOAP is a pastiche. But I think in some ways that today, parody is complimentary, and pastiche is the insult--in an ironic sort of way.

5:16 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home